Kazuma
cd74497de6
fix: restore ScoringConfig improvements lost in refactor commit docs: rewrite README and CLAUDE.md to reflect current architecture code-format code fixes
32 lines
1.2 KiB
JavaScript
32 lines
1.2 KiB
JavaScript
import { test } from 'node:test';
|
|
import assert from 'node:assert/strict';
|
|
import { EtfScorer } from '../src/screener/scorers/EtfScorer.js';
|
|
|
|
const rules = {
|
|
gates: { maxExpenseRatio: 0.5 },
|
|
weights: { yield: 2, lowCost: 3 },
|
|
thresholds: { minYield: 1.5, maxExpense: 0.1, minVolume: 500000 },
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
test('rejects ETF with expense ratio above gate', () => {
|
|
const result = EtfScorer.score({ expenseRatio: 0.8, yield: 2.0 }, rules);
|
|
assert.equal(result.label, '🔴 REJECT');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('efficient label for low-cost, high-yield ETF', () => {
|
|
const result = EtfScorer.score({ expenseRatio: 0.03, yield: 2.0, volume: 1000000 }, rules);
|
|
assert.equal(result.label, '🟢 Efficient');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('neutral when yield is below threshold', () => {
|
|
const result = EtfScorer.score({ expenseRatio: 0.03, yield: 0.4, volume: 1000000 }, rules);
|
|
assert.equal(result.label, '🟡 Neutral');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('audit breakdown includes cost, yield, vol keys', () => {
|
|
const result = EtfScorer.score({ expenseRatio: 0.03, yield: 2.0, volume: 1000000 }, rules);
|
|
assert(result.audit.breakdown.cost != null);
|
|
assert(result.audit.breakdown.yield != null);
|
|
assert(result.audit.breakdown.vol != null);
|
|
});
|